Botswana vs Iran: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Botswana
50
in 2014
Iran
46.77
in 2014
Botswana rank
152nd
Iran rank
153rd

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Botswana
  • Iran
01020304050200520092014

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 50 against 46.77 in Iran, a difference of 3.23.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Iran's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 152nd and Iran ranks 153rd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Iran in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Iran Difference Ahead
2000s 38.06 35.81 2.26 Botswana
2010s 45.48 46.77 1.29 Iran

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Botswana or Iran?
Botswana, at 50 against 46.77 in Iran as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Botswana and Iran?
3.23, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iran?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Botswana and Iran rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Botswana ranks 152nd and Iran ranks 153rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.