Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Portugal: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
85.48
in 2014
Portugal
85.48
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
43rd
Portugal rank
43rd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Portugal
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 85.48 against 85.48 in Portugal, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Portugal ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 43rd and Portugal ranks 43rd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.1 | 82.26 | 5.16 | Portugal |
| 2010s | 85.48 | 85.48 | 0 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Portugal?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 85.48 against 85.48 in Portugal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Portugal?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Portugal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Portugal rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 43rd and Portugal ranks 43rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.