Bolivia vs Sierra Leone: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Bolivia
61.29
in 2014
Sierra Leone
61.29
in 2014
Bolivia rank
131st
Sierra Leone rank
131st
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Bolivia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 61.29 against 61.29 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Bolivia ranks 131st and Sierra Leone ranks 131st of 181 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.77 | 52.58 | 4.19 | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 67.42 | 60.32 | 7.1 | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Bolivia or Sierra Leone?
- Bolivia, at 61.29 against 61.29 in Sierra Leone as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Bolivia and Sierra Leone?
- 0, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Sierra Leone?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bolivia and Sierra Leone rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Bolivia ranks 131st and Sierra Leone ranks 131st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.