Bhutan vs Palestine: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Bhutan
46.77
in 2014
Palestine
45.16
in 2014
Bhutan rank
156th
Palestine rank
158th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Bhutan
- Palestine
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 46.77 against 45.16 in Palestine, a difference of 1.61.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 156th and Palestine ranks 158th of 184 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.77 | 41.94 | 4.84 | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 46.77 | 43.87 | 2.9 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Bhutan or Palestine?
- Bhutan, at 46.77 against 45.16 in Palestine as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Bhutan and Palestine?
- 1.61, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Palestine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bhutan and Palestine rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Bhutan ranks 156th and Palestine ranks 158th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.