Bhutan vs Botswana: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Bhutan
46.77
in 2014
Botswana
50
in 2014
Bhutan rank
153rd
Botswana rank
152nd

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Botswana
01020304050200520092014

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 50 against 46.77 in Bhutan, a difference of 3.23.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 153rd and Botswana ranks 152nd of 181 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Botswana Difference Ahead
2000s 46.77 38.06 8.71 Bhutan
2010s 46.77 45.48 1.29 Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Bhutan or Botswana?
Botswana, at 50 against 46.77 in Bhutan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Bhutan and Botswana?
3.23, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Botswana?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Bhutan and Botswana rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Bhutan ranks 153rd and Botswana ranks 152nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.