Benin vs Mozambique: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Benin
66.13
in 2014
Mozambique
66.13
in 2014
Benin rank
115th
Mozambique rank
115th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Benin
  • Mozambique
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Benin currently reports 66.13 against 66.13 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.

Benin ranks 115th and Mozambique ranks 115th of 181 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 47.42 52.9 5.48 Mozambique
2010s 59.35 63.23 3.87 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Benin or Mozambique?
Benin, at 66.13 against 66.13 in Mozambique as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Benin and Mozambique?
0, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Mozambique?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Benin and Mozambique rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Benin ranks 115th and Mozambique ranks 115th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.