Belize vs Pakistan: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Belize
75.81
in 2014
Pakistan
76.77
in 2014
Belize rank
86th
Pakistan rank
85th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Belize
  • Pakistan
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 76.77 against 75.81 in Belize, a difference of 0.96.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 86th and Pakistan ranks 85th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 72.58 70 2.58 Belize
2010s 74.19 76.84 2.65 Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Belize or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 76.77 against 75.81 in Belize as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Belize and Pakistan?
0.96, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Pakistan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Belize and Pakistan rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Belize ranks 86th and Pakistan ranks 85th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.