Belize vs Gambia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Belize
75.81
in 2014
Gambia
75.81
in 2014
Belize rank
86th
Gambia rank
86th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Belize
  • Gambia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Belize currently reports 75.81 against 75.81 in Gambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 86th and Gambia ranks 86th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Gambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Gambia Difference Ahead
2000s 72.58 70 2.58 Belize
2010s 74.19 75.16 0.9677 Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Belize or Gambia?
Belize, at 75.81 against 75.81 in Gambia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Belize and Gambia?
0, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Gambia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Belize and Gambia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Belize ranks 86th and Gambia ranks 86th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.