Azerbaijan vs Mozambique: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Azerbaijan
66.13
in 2014
Mozambique
66.13
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
117th
Mozambique rank
117th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Mozambique
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 66.13 against 66.13 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mozambique ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 117th and Mozambique ranks 117th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.32 | 52.9 | 2.58 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 65.16 | 63.23 | 1.94 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Azerbaijan or Mozambique?
- Azerbaijan, at 66.13 against 66.13 in Mozambique as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Azerbaijan and Mozambique?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Mozambique?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Azerbaijan and Mozambique rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Azerbaijan ranks 117th and Mozambique ranks 117th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.