Australia vs Malaysia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import
Australia
93.55
in 2014
Malaysia
93.55
in 2014
Australia rank
16th
Malaysia rank
16th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import over time
- Australia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 93.55 against 93.55 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Malaysia ranks 16th of 184 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.55 | 90.32 | 3.23 | Australia |
| 2010s | 93.55 | 92.26 | 1.29 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Australia or Malaysia?
- Australia, at 93.55 against 93.55 in Malaysia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Australia and Malaysia?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malaysia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Malaysia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Australia ranks 16th and Malaysia ranks 16th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.