Armenia, Republic of vs Italy: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Armenia, Republic of
77.42
in 2014
Italy
77.42
in 2014
Armenia, Republic of rank
83rd
Italy rank
83rd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Armenia, Republic of
- Italy
How they compare
Armenia, Republic of currently reports 77.42 against 77.42 in Italy, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Armenia, Republic of ranks 83rd and Italy ranks 83rd of 183 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia, Republic of | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.65 | 77.42 | 16.77 | Italy |
| 2010s | 77.42 | 77.42 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Armenia, Republic of or Italy?
- Armenia, Republic of, at 77.42 against 77.42 in Italy as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Armenia, Republic of and Italy?
- 0, with Armenia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia, Republic of and Italy?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Armenia, Republic of and Italy rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Armenia, Republic of ranks 83rd and Italy ranks 83rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.