Argentina vs Liberia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Argentina
58.06
in 2014
Liberia
59.68
in 2014
Argentina rank
140th
Liberia rank
138th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Argentina
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 59.68 against 58.06 in Argentina, a difference of 1.62.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 140th and Liberia ranks 138th of 183 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.61 | 55.65 | 20.97 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 67.1 | 59.35 | 7.74 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Argentina or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 59.68 against 58.06 in Argentina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Argentina and Liberia?
- 1.62, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Liberia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Argentina and Liberia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Argentina ranks 140th and Liberia ranks 138th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.