Argentina vs Belarus: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Argentina
58.06
in 2014
Belarus
58.06
in 2014
Argentina rank
138th
Belarus rank
138th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Argentina
- Belarus
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 58.06 against 58.06 in Belarus, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 138th and Belarus ranks 138th of 181 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.13 | 48.39 | 27.74 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 67.1 | 58.06 | 9.03 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Argentina or Belarus?
- Argentina, at 58.06 against 58.06 in Belarus as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Argentina and Belarus?
- 0, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Belarus?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Argentina and Belarus rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Argentina ranks 138th and Belarus ranks 138th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.