Antigua and Barbuda vs Comoros: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Antigua and Barbuda
69.35
in 2014
Comoros
67.74
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
109th
Comoros rank
111th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Comoros
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 69.35 against 67.74 in Comoros, a difference of 1.61.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 109th and Comoros ranks 111th of 183 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.97 | 67.74 | 13.23 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 74.52 | 67.74 | 6.77 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Antigua and Barbuda or Comoros?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 69.35 against 67.74 in Comoros as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Antigua and Barbuda and Comoros?
- 1.61, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Comoros?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Comoros rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 109th and Comoros ranks 111th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.