Angola vs Malawi: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import
Angola
37.1
in 2014
Malawi
43.55
in 2014
Angola rank
163rd
Malawi rank
160th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import over time
- Angola
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 43.55 against 37.1 in Angola, a difference of 6.45.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malawi ahead.
Angola ranks 163rd and Malawi ranks 160th of 184 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.29 | 20.32 | 9.03 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 33.87 | 37.1 | 3.23 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Angola or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 43.55 against 37.1 in Angola as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Angola and Malawi?
- 6.45, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Malawi?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Angola and Malawi rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Angola ranks 163rd and Malawi ranks 160th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.