Algeria vs Indonesia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Algeria
64.52
in 2014
Indonesia
64.52
in 2014
Algeria rank
121st
Indonesia rank
121st
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Algeria
- Indonesia
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 64.52 against 64.52 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 121st and Indonesia ranks 121st of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 62.9 | 7.1 | Algeria |
| 2010s | 64.52 | 65.81 | 1.29 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Algeria or Indonesia?
- Algeria, at 64.52 against 64.52 in Indonesia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Algeria and Indonesia?
- 0, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Indonesia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Algeria and Indonesia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Algeria ranks 121st and Indonesia ranks 121st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.