Albania vs Armenia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Albania
77.42
in 2014
Armenia, Republic of
77.42
in 2014
Albania rank
83rd
Armenia, Republic of rank
83rd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Albania
- Armenia, Republic of
How they compare
Albania currently reports 77.42 against 77.42 in Armenia, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 83rd and Armenia, Republic of ranks 83rd of 183 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Armenia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.26 | 60.65 | 11.61 | Albania |
| 2010s | 77.42 | 77.42 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Albania or Armenia, Republic of?
- Albania, at 77.42 against 77.42 in Armenia, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Albania and Armenia, Republic of?
- 0, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Armenia, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Albania and Armenia, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Albania ranks 83rd and Armenia, Republic of ranks 83rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.