Nigeria vs Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Nigeria
13.72
in 2019
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
0
in 2019
Nigeria rank
183rd
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank
186th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Nigeria
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 13.72 against 0 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of, a difference of 13.72.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ahead.
Nigeria ranks 183rd and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 186th of 191 countries.
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Nigeria or Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- Nigeria, at 13.72 against 0 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Nigeria and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 13.72, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Nigeria and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Nigeria ranks 183rd and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 186th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.