Malawi vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Malawi
80.63
in 2019
Senegal
81.24
in 2019
Malawi rank
97th
Senegal rank
94th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Malawi
  • Senegal
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 81.24 against 80.63 in Malawi, a difference of 0.61.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 97th and Senegal ranks 94th of 188 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1, Malawi or Senegal?
Senegal, at 81.24 against 80.63 in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Malawi and Senegal?
0.61, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Senegal?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Malawi and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Malawi ranks 97th and Senegal ranks 94th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.