Malawi vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Malawi
80.63
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of
80.29
in 2019
Malawi rank
98th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
99th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Malawi
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 80.63 against 80.29 in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0.34.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
Malawi ranks 98th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 99th of 190 countries.
Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Malawi or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Malawi, at 80.63 against 80.29 in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Malawi and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 0.34, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Malawi ranks 98th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 99th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.