Madagascar, Republic of vs Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Madagascar, Republic of
- Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of
How they compare
Madagascar, Republic of currently reports 64.97 against 64.52 in Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of, a difference of 0.45.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of ahead.
Madagascar, Republic of ranks 146th and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of ranks 148th of 190 countries.
Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Madagascar, Republic of or Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- Madagascar, Republic of, at 64.97 against 64.52 in Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Madagascar, Republic of and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- 0.45, with Madagascar, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar, Republic of and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar, Republic of and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Madagascar, Republic of ranks 146th and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of ranks 148th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.