Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Syrian Arab Republic: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Iran, Islamic Republic of
49.82
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
49.7
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
166th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
167th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 49.82 against 49.7 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.12.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 166th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 167th of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Iran, Islamic Republic of or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 49.82 against 49.7 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0.12, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 166th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 167th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.