Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Equatorial Guinea
14.34
in 2019
Zimbabwe
18.76
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
180th
Zimbabwe rank
178th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 18.76 against 14.34 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 4.42.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 180th and Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 190 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Equatorial Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 18.76 against 14.34 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 4.42, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 180th and Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.