Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Nigeria: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
14.34
in 2019
Nigeria
13.72
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
180th
Nigeria rank
182nd
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
- Nigeria
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 14.34 against 13.72 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.62.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 180th and Nigeria ranks 182nd of 190 countries.
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Nigeria?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 14.34 against 13.72 in Nigeria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Nigeria?
- 0.62, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Nigeria?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Nigeria rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 180th and Nigeria ranks 182nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.