Cyprus vs Nepal: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Cyprus
95.1
in 2019
Nepal
96.42
in 2019
Cyprus rank
54th
Nepal rank
53rd

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Cyprus
  • Nepal
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 96.42 against 95.1 in Cyprus, a difference of 1.32.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 54th and Nepal ranks 53rd of 188 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1, Cyprus or Nepal?
Nepal, at 96.42 against 95.1 in Cyprus as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Cyprus and Nepal?
1.32, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Nepal?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Cyprus and Nepal rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Cyprus ranks 54th and Nepal ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.