Cyprus vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Cyprus
95.1
in 2019
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
96.59
in 2019
Cyprus rank
55th
Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank
53rd
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Cyprus
- Lao People’s Democratic Republic
How they compare
Lao People’s Democratic Republic currently reports 96.59 against 95.1 in Cyprus, a difference of 1.49.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lao People’s Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 55th and Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Lao People’s Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Cyprus or Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
- Lao People’s Democratic Republic, at 96.59 against 95.1 in Cyprus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Cyprus and Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
- 1.49, with Lao People’s Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cyprus and Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Cyprus ranks 55th and Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.