Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1
Chad
13.62
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
14.34
in 2019
Chad rank
181st
Equatorial Guinea rank
178th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time
- Chad
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 14.34 against 13.62 in Chad, a difference of 0.72.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 181st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 178th of 188 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 14.34 against 13.62 in Chad as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.72, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?
- Chad ranks 181st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 178th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.