Statizoid

Chad vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Chad
13.62
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo
0
in 2019
Chad rank
181st
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
183rd

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Chad
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
051015201420162019

How they compare

Chad currently reports 13.62 against 0 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 13.62.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 181st and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 183rd of 188 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1, Chad or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Chad, at 13.62 against 0 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo?
13.62, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Chad ranks 181st and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 183rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.