Central African Republic vs Cote d'Ivoire: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Central African Republic
56.73
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire
55.5
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
162nd
Cote d'Ivoire rank
163rd
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Central African Republic
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 56.73 against 55.5 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 1.23.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 162nd and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Central African Republic or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Central African Republic, at 56.73 against 55.5 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Central African Republic and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 1.23, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Central African Republic ranks 162nd and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.