Canada vs United States of America: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Canada
99.64
in 2019
United States of America
99.82
in 2019
Canada rank
28th
United States of America rank
26th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Canada
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 99.82 against 99.64 in Canada, a difference of 0.18.
Across all 6 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 28th and United States of America ranks 26th of 190 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Canada or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 99.82 against 99.64 in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Canada and United States of America?
- 0.18, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and United States of America?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Canada and United States of America rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Canada ranks 28th and United States of America ranks 26th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.