Cameroon vs Chad: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Cameroon
3.23
in 2019
Chad
13.62
in 2019
Cameroon rank
182nd
Chad rank
181st

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Cameroon
  • Chad
2.557.51012.5201420162019

How they compare

Chad currently reports 13.62 against 3.23 in Cameroon, a difference of 10.39.

That makes Chad's figure about 4.2 times Cameroon's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 182nd and Chad ranks 181st of 188 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1, Cameroon or Chad?
Chad, at 13.62 against 3.23 in Cameroon as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Cameroon and Chad?
10.39, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Chad?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Cameroon and Chad rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Cameroon ranks 182nd and Chad ranks 181st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.