Bhutan vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Bhutan
98.57
in 2019
Namibia
98.39
in 2019
Bhutan rank
41st
Namibia rank
42nd

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Bhutan
  • Namibia
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 98.57 against 98.39 in Namibia, a difference of 0.18.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 41st and Namibia ranks 42nd of 188 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1, Bhutan or Namibia?
Bhutan, at 98.57 against 98.39 in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Bhutan and Namibia?
0.18, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Namibia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Bhutan and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Bhutan ranks 41st and Namibia ranks 42nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.