Bahrain, Kingdom of vs Taiwan Province of China: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Bahrain, Kingdom of
85.3
in 2019
Taiwan Province of China
83.37
in 2019
Bahrain, Kingdom of rank
84th
Taiwan Province of China rank
86th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Bahrain, Kingdom of
- Taiwan Province of China
How they compare
Bahrain, Kingdom of currently reports 85.3 against 83.37 in Taiwan Province of China, a difference of 1.93.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Taiwan Province of China ahead.
Bahrain, Kingdom of ranks 84th and Taiwan Province of China ranks 86th of 190 countries.
Taiwan Province of China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Bahrain, Kingdom of or Taiwan Province of China?
- Bahrain, Kingdom of, at 85.3 against 83.37 in Taiwan Province of China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Bahrain, Kingdom of and Taiwan Province of China?
- 1.93, with Bahrain, Kingdom of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain, Kingdom of and Taiwan Province of China?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bahrain, Kingdom of and Taiwan Province of China rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Bahrain, Kingdom of ranks 84th and Taiwan Province of China ranks 86th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.