Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Moldova, Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Azerbaijan, Republic of
98.87
in 2019
Moldova, Republic of
98.79
in 2019
Azerbaijan, Republic of rank
37th
Moldova, Republic of rank
38th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Azerbaijan, Republic of
- Moldova, Republic of
How they compare
Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 98.87 against 98.79 in Moldova, Republic of, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Moldova, Republic of ahead.
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 37th and Moldova, Republic of ranks 38th of 190 countries.
Moldova, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Azerbaijan, Republic of or Moldova, Republic of?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 98.87 against 98.79 in Moldova, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Moldova, Republic of?
- 0.08, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Moldova, Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Moldova, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 37th and Moldova, Republic of ranks 38th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.