Armenia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Armenia
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 99.45 against 99.28 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
Armenia ranks 32nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Armenia or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Armenia, at 99.45 against 99.28 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Armenia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 0.17, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Armenia ranks 32nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.