Angola vs Kuwait: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Angola
74.55
in 2019
Kuwait
74.55
in 2019
Angola rank
109th
Kuwait rank
109th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Angola
  • Kuwait
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Angola currently reports 74.55 against 74.55 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kuwait ahead.

Angola ranks 109th and Kuwait ranks 109th of 188 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1, Angola or Kuwait?
Angola, at 74.55 against 74.55 in Kuwait as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Angola and Kuwait?
0, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Kuwait?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Angola and Kuwait rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Angola ranks 109th and Kuwait ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.