Türkiye vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Türkiye
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 98.22 against 98.22 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.
Türkiye ranks 46th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 46th of 190 countries.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Türkiye or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Türkiye, at 98.22 against 98.22 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Türkiye and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 0, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Türkiye and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Türkiye ranks 46th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 46th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.