Chinese Taipei vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Chinese Taipei
97.63
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
97.93
in 2019
Chinese Taipei rank
51st
United Arab Emirates rank
50th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Chinese Taipei
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 97.93 against 97.63 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Chinese Taipei ranks 51st and United Arab Emirates ranks 50th of 190 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Chinese Taipei or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 97.93 against 97.63 in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Chinese Taipei and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.3, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chinese Taipei and United Arab Emirates?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chinese Taipei and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Chinese Taipei ranks 51st and United Arab Emirates ranks 50th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.