Sierra Leone vs Vanuatu: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Sierra Leone
57.99
in 2019
Vanuatu
57.99
in 2019
Sierra Leone rank
144th
Vanuatu rank
144th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Vanuatu
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 57.99 against 57.99 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.

Sierra Leone ranks 144th and Vanuatu ranks 144th of 188 countries.

Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Sierra Leone or Vanuatu?
Sierra Leone, at 57.99 against 57.99 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Sierra Leone and Vanuatu?
0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Vanuatu?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Sierra Leone and Vanuatu rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Sierra Leone ranks 144th and Vanuatu ranks 144th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.