Republic of Moldova vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Republic of Moldova
72.19
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
72.19
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
112th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
112th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 72.19 against 72.19 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 112th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 112th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Republic of Moldova or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Republic of Moldova, at 72.19 against 72.19 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Republic of Moldova and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 112th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 112th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.