Micronesia (country) vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Micronesia (country)
85.21
in 2019
Senegal
85.21
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
97th
Senegal rank
97th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Senegal
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 85.21 against 85.21 in Senegal, a difference of 0.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 97th and Senegal ranks 97th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Micronesia (country) or Senegal?
Micronesia (country), at 85.21 against 85.21 in Senegal as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Micronesia (country) and Senegal?
0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Senegal?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Micronesia (country) and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Micronesia (country) ranks 97th and Senegal ranks 97th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.