Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Vietnam: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
70.61
in 2019
Vietnam
71.01
in 2019
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank
131st
Vietnam rank
129th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 71.01 against 70.61 in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 131st and Vietnam ranks 129th of 190 countries.
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Mauritania, Islamic Republic of or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 71.01 against 70.61 in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Vietnam?
- 0.4, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Vietnam?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Vietnam rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 131st and Vietnam ranks 129th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.