Marshall Islands vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Marshall Islands
86.39
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
86.39
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
81st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
81st
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Marshall Islands
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 86.39 against 86.39 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 81st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 81st of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Marshall Islands or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Marshall Islands, at 86.39 against 86.39 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Marshall Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Marshall Islands ranks 81st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 81st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.