Latvia, Republic of vs North Macedonia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Latvia, Republic of
99.41
in 2019
North Macedonia, Republic of
99.41
in 2019
Latvia, Republic of rank
32nd
North Macedonia, Republic of rank
32nd
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Latvia, Republic of
- North Macedonia, Republic of
How they compare
Latvia, Republic of currently reports 99.41 against 99.41 in North Macedonia, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, North Macedonia, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Latvia, Republic of ranks 32nd and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 32nd of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Latvia, Republic of or North Macedonia, Republic of?
- Latvia, Republic of, at 99.41 against 99.41 in North Macedonia, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Latvia, Republic of and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 0, with Latvia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia, Republic of and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Latvia, Republic of and North Macedonia, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Latvia, Republic of ranks 32nd and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 32nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.