Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Solomon Islands: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Lao People's Democratic Republic
65.09
in 2019
Solomon Islands
65.09
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
136th
Solomon Islands rank
136th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 65.09 against 65.09 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 136th and Solomon Islands ranks 136th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Solomon Islands?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 65.09 against 65.09 in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Solomon Islands rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 136th and Solomon Islands ranks 136th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.