Lao People’s Democratic Republic vs Pakistan: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
65.09
in 2019
Pakistan
68.05
in 2019
Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank
136th
Pakistan rank
134th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Lao People’s Democratic Republic
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 68.05 against 65.09 in Lao People’s Democratic Republic, a difference of 2.96.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lao People’s Democratic Republic ahead.
Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 136th and Pakistan ranks 134th of 190 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Lao People’s Democratic Republic or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 68.05 against 65.09 in Lao People’s Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Pakistan?
- 2.96, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Pakistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Pakistan rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 136th and Pakistan ranks 134th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.