Japan vs Lithuania: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Japan
99.19
in 2019
Lithuania
99.11
in 2019
Japan rank
42nd
Lithuania rank
43rd

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Japan
  • Lithuania
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Japan currently reports 99.19 against 99.11 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.08.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 42nd and Lithuania ranks 43rd of 188 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Japan or Lithuania?
Japan, at 99.19 against 99.11 in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Japan and Lithuania?
0.08, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Japan ranks 42nd and Lithuania ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.