Iran vs Mozambique: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Iran
81.07
in 2019
Mozambique
79.29
in 2019
Iran rank
102nd
Mozambique rank
104th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Iran
  • Mozambique
20406080201420162019

How they compare

Iran currently reports 81.07 against 79.29 in Mozambique, a difference of 1.78.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Mozambique ahead.

Iran ranks 102nd and Mozambique ranks 104th of 188 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Iran or Mozambique?
Iran, at 81.07 against 79.29 in Mozambique as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Iran and Mozambique?
1.78, with Iran ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Mozambique?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Iran and Mozambique rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Iran ranks 102nd and Mozambique ranks 104th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.