Eswatini vs Latvia: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Eswatini
99.41
in 2019
Latvia
99.41
in 2019
Eswatini rank
32nd
Latvia rank
32nd

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Latvia
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 99.41 against 99.41 in Latvia, a difference of 0.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 32nd and Latvia ranks 32nd of 188 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Eswatini or Latvia?
Eswatini, at 99.41 against 99.41 in Latvia as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Eswatini and Latvia?
0, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Latvia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Eswatini and Latvia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Eswatini ranks 32nd and Latvia ranks 32nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.