Equatorial Guinea vs Mongolia: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)
Equatorial Guinea
9.47
in 2019
Mongolia
1.18
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
177th
Mongolia rank
179th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Mongolia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 9.47 against 1.18 in Mongolia, a difference of 8.29.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 8.0 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 177th and Mongolia ranks 179th of 188 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Equatorial Guinea or Mongolia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 9.47 against 1.18 in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Equatorial Guinea and Mongolia?
- 8.29, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Mongolia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 177th and Mongolia ranks 179th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.